First-Generation Home-Use Devices

The home aesthetic device market is either extremely large or quite small, depending on how it is defined. A large number of manufacturers have long offered a variety of relatively low-technology products intended to improve skin condition, remove unwanted hair, and address cellulite. Most of these products, however, were not based on medical technology, so the benefit they could provide was limited, and their acceptance has been slow. Table 25.1 shows some of these devices; many have been available for several years, while others are relatively new. Quite a few of the home hair-removal devices have been sold for more than

Table 25.1 Low Tech Home Aesthetic Devices

Type of Device

Application

Selected Manufacturers

Details

Electric clippers

Hair removal

Braun, Emjoi, Panasonic, Philips/Norelco, Wahl, others

Available for many years, widely used

Electric razor

Hair removal

Braun, Panasonic, Philips/ Norelco, Remington, others

Available for many years, widely used

Home electrolysis

Hair removal

Emjoi, Tactica

Newer, limited

(RF)

International, others

acceptance

Rotating coils

Hair removal

Braun, Emjoi, Epilady, Tactica International, others

Newer, limited acceptance

Ionic blemish

Acne

Tactica International,

Newer, limited

remover

others

acceptance

Massager

Cellulite

Guitay*, Tactica International, others

Newer, gaining some acceptance

Ionic facial toner

Skin rejuvenation

Tactica International, Ya-Man, others

Newer, limited acceptance

Microcurrent facial toner

Skin rejuvenation

Skin Star, SLC, others

Newer, limited acceptance but

growing

Microdermabrasion

Skin rejuvenation

Guthy Renker, Johnson & Johnson, Mary Kay, L’Oreal, Procter & Gamble, Zia, others

Relatively new but gaining some acceptance; many new products entering the market

Ultrasonic facial

Skin rejuvenation

Tactica International,

Newer, limited

toner

Ya-Man, others

acceptance

Source: Medical Insight, Inc.

*Device is FDA-cleared for muscular pain relief.

a decade with a few changes. Most are not subject to Food & Drug Administration (FDA), approval and therefore are not required to submit clinical studies demonstrating safety and efficacy. It can be reasonably assumed that such devices provide little significant benefit and in fact, most of the home hair-removal systems offer only temporary hair removal.

Updated: October 9, 2015 — 4:22 am