Category: COSMETIC APPLICATIONS. OF LASER AND LIGHT-. BASED SYSTEMS

Substantial Equivalence Comparison

Manufacturers should attempt to make comparison of the new device to its predicate as easy as possible for the FDA reviewer. The 510(k) notification should therefore include discussion of the similarities and differences between the device and its predicate device, and should make use of comparative tables whenever possible. Comparisons might con­sider such areas as […]

Labeling119

Although manufacturers may submit drafts of their device labeling, including the label on the immediate container of the device, the submission should be representative of the final version. The directions for use should include a specific statement regarding a clini­cally significant use of the device and any related warnings, contraindications, or limita­tions (e. g., precautions […]

Components of a 510(k) Application114

• Cover letter • Indication for use • 510 (k) summary • Truthful and accuracy statement • Classification summary and certification • Financial certification or disclosure statement • Declaration of conformity and summary reports • Executive summary • Device description • Substantial equivalence discussion • Sterilization and shelf life • Biocompatibility • Software validation • […]